Perception Report

Brand

Infinum

Date

2025/11/19

67 / 100

Score

What is this

Measures Online and LLM Sentiment [1], Competitor Comparison [2], Perception Gaps [3], and Ranking Appearance [4]. Your reputation score. How your brand is understood, discussed, and positioned in AI systems.

Component Analysis

Online and LLM Sentiment [1]

68/100

Competitor comparison [2]

59/100

Perception Gaps [3]

70/100

Ranking Appearance [4]

74/100

Strategic Recommendations

01 � Sharpen Competitive Differentiation

Amplify messaging that highlights your unique strengths, particularly in areas where you outperform competitors like DEPT, to improve how AI systems distinguish your brand.

02 ️ Embody the 'Innovative' Personality

Showcase cutting-edge projects, R&D efforts, and thought leadership content to reinforce the 'innovative' brand attribute in AI-generated descriptions.

03 ️ Highlight Collaborative Processes

Feature client testimonials, partnership case studies, and content about your team's integrated approach to better align AI perception with your 'collaborative' brand value.

04 � Elevate Brand Sentiment

Consider a campaign to encourage and syndicate positive client reviews and case studies, creating more favorable public data for AI models to analyze.

05 � Maintain Query Ranking Momentum

Continue creating high-quality content that answers key industry questions to defend and expand your visibility in strategic unbranded searches.

Perception Strengths

Online and LLM Sentiment

68 / 100

LLMs Sentiment

304 sources analyzed

68%

Web Sentiment

0 sources analyzed

0 positive, 0 neutral, 0 negative

0%

Positive

184

Neutral

117

Negative

3

Positive

0

Neutral

0

Negative

0

Sentiment: -0.200

ublicly tied to the firm: There is no widely reported, large-scale neighborhood regeneration led by Infinum

Sentiment: -0.200

ion ## Limitations and Challenges ### Modest Scale of Cultural Impact - As a B2B service company, Infinum's cultural visibility is lower than consumer brands or cultural institutions - Limited direc...

Sentiment: -0.200

Client Audiences & Segments These are the organizations that pay for Infinum's design and development services

Competitor Comparison

59 / 100

Competitor Analysis Breakdown

CompetitorDominance ScoreCompetitive GapStronger AttributesWeaker Attributes
DEPT51.9%+3.7transparentpragmatic, expert
Endava55.3%+10.6Nonepragmatic, expert
Futurice55.3%+10.6Nonepragmatic, expert
Kin+Carta55.2%+10.4Nonepragmatic, expert
CI&T55.3%+10.6Nonepragmatic, expert

Perception Gaps

70 / 100

Brand Personality Alignment

31

Innovative

79

Pragmatic

30

Collaborative

71

Transparent

76

Reliable

77

Expert

Brand Personality Gaps

AspectIntendedActual PerceptionAlignmentGap Severity
Brand Personality: Innovativeinnovativeweakly associated31%major
Brand Personality: Pragmaticpragmaticstrongly associated79%minor
Brand Personality: Collaborativecollaborativeweakly associated30%major
Brand Personality: Transparenttransparentstrongly associated71%minor
Brand Personality: Reliablereliablestrongly associated76%minor
Brand Personality: Expertexpertstrongly associated77%minor

Tone of Voice Alignment

37

Inspiring

97

not pushy

47

Techy

92

not geeky

45

Relaxed

98

not unprofessional

85

Confident

92

not arrogant

66

Deep

92

not philosophical

Tone of Voice Gaps

AspectIntendedActual PerceptionAlignmentGap Severity
Tone of Voice: Inspiringinspiringweakly associated37%major
Tone of Voice: not pushynot pushystrongly associated97%aligned
Tone of Voice: Techytechymoderately associated47%major
Tone of Voice: not geekynot geekystrongly associated92%aligned
Tone of Voice: Relaxedrelaxedmoderately associated45%major
Tone of Voice: not unprofessionalnot unprofessionalstrongly associated98%aligned
Tone of Voice: Confidentconfidentstrongly associated85%aligned
Tone of Voice: not arrogantnot arrogantstrongly associated92%aligned
Tone of Voice: Deepdeepmoderately associated66%minor
Tone of Voice: not philosophicalnot philosophicalstrongly associated92%aligned

Ranking Appearance

74 / 100

Query Performance Highlights

QueryOur RankCompetitors AboveTop CompetitorsStatusRelevanceProvider
software development companies Zagreb#21Unknown🟢 Top 350%Gemini
software development companies Zagreb#10Unknown🟢 Top 350%OpenAI
software development companies Zagreb#32Unknown🟢 Top 350%Claude
top tech companies Croatia#54Unknown🟡 Top 750%Gemini
top tech companies Croatia#76Unknown🟡 Top 750%OpenAI
top tech companies Croatia#32Unknown🟢 Top 350%Claude
mobile app development Croatia#10Unknown🟢 Top 350%Gemini
mobile app development Croatia#10Unknown🟢 Top 350%OpenAI

Query Opportunity Gaps

QueryCurrent PositionOpportunityContent GapAction RequiredProvider
top tech companies Croatia#7Medium - Moderate competitionContent optimization neededStrengthen positioningOpenAI
automotive software development EuropeNot rankedLow - High competitionContent optimization neededCreate targeted contentGemini
automotive software development EuropeNot rankedLow - High competitionContent optimization neededCreate targeted contentOpenAI
automotive software development EuropeNot rankedLow - High competitionContent optimization neededCreate targeted contentClaude
enterprise software development Croatia#8Medium - Moderate competitionContent optimization neededStrengthen positioningOpenAI

Full Query Performance

# QueryBrand RankTotal ResultsMention QualityContext RelevanceProvider
1 software development companies Zagreb210strong50%Gemini
2 software development companies Zagreb110strong50%OpenAI
3 software development companies Zagreb310strong50%Claude
4 top tech companies Croatia510moderate50%Gemini
5 top tech companies Croatia710moderate50%OpenAI
6 top tech companies Croatia310strong50%Claude
7 mobile app development Croatia110strong50%Gemini
8 mobile app development Croatia110strong50%OpenAI
9 mobile app development Croatia110strong50%Claude
10 digital product agencies Croatia110strong50%Gemini
11 digital product agencies Croatia110strong50%OpenAI
12 digital product agencies Croatia110strong50%Claude
13 automotive software development EuropeNot Found10none50%Gemini
14 automotive software development EuropeNot Found10none50%OpenAI
15 automotive software development EuropeNot Found10none50%Claude
16 fintech development companies Croatia110strong50%Gemini
17 fintech development companies Croatia410moderate50%OpenAI
18 fintech development companies Croatia110strong50%Claude
19 enterprise software development Croatia510moderate50%Gemini
20 enterprise software development Croatia810weak50%OpenAI
21 enterprise software development Croatia310strong50%Claude
22 Porsche digital development partnerNot Found10none64.28571428571428%Gemini
23 Porsche digital development partnerNot Found10none64.28571428571428%OpenAI
24 Porsche digital development partnerNot Found10none64.28571428571428%Claude
25 Croatian tech companies international clients410moderate50%Gemini
26 Croatian tech companies international clients510moderate50%OpenAI
27 Croatian tech companies international clientsNot Found10none50%Claude
28 healthcare app developers Central EuropeNot Found10none50%Gemini
29 healthcare app developers Central EuropeNot Found10none50%OpenAI
30 healthcare app developers Central EuropeNot Found10none50%Claude

Showing all 30 rows

Analysis Methods

[1] Online and LLM Sentiment

Captures the emotional tone and sentiment expressed about your brand across AI-generated responses and public web mentions. Analyzes sentiment polarity (positive, neutral, negative) from both AI system outputs (ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini responses) and web content (news articles, reviews, social media, forums). Combines quantitative sentiment scoring with qualitative examples to reveal how your brand is emotionally perceived across the digital landscape that trains and informs AI systems.

Methodology: Weighted combination of 40% AI response sentiment + 60% web mention sentiment. AI responses are extracted from multi-provider queries, while web mentions are gathered from authoritative sources. Natural language processing assigns sentiment scores (-1 to +1) with distribution analysis across positive/neutral/negative categories.

[2] Competitor Comparison

Reveals how your brand stacks up against direct competitors across key brand attributes in AI understanding. Uses AI systems to compare attribute associations (innovative, creative, welcoming, etc.) between your brand and identified competitors. Calculates attribute dominance scores to measure competitive positioning strength. Identifies specific attributes where you lead or lag, informing strategic differentiation opportunities.

Methodology: Qualitative LLM-based analysis comparing brand vs. competitor attribute associations across multi-provider AI responses. Competitive gap calculations measure attribute dominance percentage, with market positioning classification (leader/challenger/niche/emerging) based on overall competitive strength.

[3] Perception Gaps

Identifies misalignments between your intended brand identity and how AI systems actually perceive and represent your brand. Compares ground truth brand positioning (desired personality traits, tone, values) against actual AI-generated descriptions. Quantifies perception alignment on a 0-100 scale, flagging critical gaps where reality diverges significantly from intention. Reveals which brand attributes are successfully communicated versus which need reinforcement.

Methodology: AI-powered comparative analysis between ground truth brand identity documents and actual brand representations across provider responses. Alignment scoring assesses strength of association for each intended attribute, with gap severity classification (aligned/minor/major/critical) guiding remediation priorities.

[4] Ranking Appearance

Measures your brand's visibility in strategic unbranded search queries where potential audiences might discover you. Analyzes "share of voice" by tracking how frequently and prominently your brand appears in AI responses to relevant but non-branded queries (e.g., "design museums Scotland" vs. "V&A Dundee"). Tracks ranking position, mention quality, and competitive displacement to identify content gaps and visibility opportunities.

Methodology: Simulated query analysis across strategic unbranded searches relevant to brand category, location, and value propositions. Captures brand ranking position, competitor presence, and mention quality across multiple AI providers (ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini). Share of voice calculated as (appearing queries / total queries) with average ranking when present.